View Poll Results: When will Stuckey be our starting PG?

Voters
19. You may not vote on this poll
  • At the beginning of the season (Chauncey is traded/coaching decision)

    2 10.53%
  • Halfway through the season (trade or Stuckey plays well enough)

    2 10.53%
  • Towards the end of the season (trade or Stuckey steps up)

    1 5.26%
  • Not this season (Chauncey will return and keep his spot)

    14 73.68%
  • Not this season (He'll be used as trade bait)

    0 0%
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: Rodney Stuckey: our starting PG?

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Glenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The Buxtons are not thieves.
    Posts
    2,908
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Codename V
    He'll play PG for us unless he gets traded.
    Ah, it's the old "you're wrong because I say you're wrong" tactic.

    If the Pistons have the same mentality that you have with that quote, Gutz, then they deserve whatever they get.

    Putting a talented, versatile player into a predetermined role before you really know what they can do is just stupid, IMO.
    Find a new slant.

  2. #2
    The Healer Black Dynamite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Having an awkward moment just to see how it feels.
    Posts
    9,638
    Quote Originally Posted by Glenn
    Ah, it's the old "you're wrong because I say you're wrong" tactic.

    If the Pistons have the same mentality that you have with that quote, Gutz, then they deserve whatever they get.

    Putting a talented, versatile player into a predetermined role before you really know what they can do is just stupid, IMO.
    Ah, it's the old "you're wrong because I say you're wrong" tactic.
    No, its the known plan, but perception can reality for you. its an intricate plot to make him SG by deflecting us with talk of him playing pg for us by Joe D...that slick bastard..

    If the Pistons have the same mentality that you have with that quote, Gutz, then they deserve whatever they get.
    the mentality that they already made their decision and trust it? I'm going to guess that they think like that quite often.


    Putting a talented, versatile player into a predetermined role before you really know what they can do is just stupid, IMO
    Like what you've been doing these past couple months for stuckey at SG? So its stupid when a guy with more knowledge and footage of stuckey's game from college to now makes the decision on what he's playing for us? SELECTIVE.
    ^
    Stalked by a Mod who gives 1 percent credence.

  3. #3
    Glenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The Buxtons are not thieves.
    Posts
    2,908
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Codename V
    Like what you've been doing these past couple months for stuckey at SG? So its stupid when a guy with more knowledge and footage of stuckey's game from college to now makes the decision on what he's playing for us? SELECTIVE.
    Read post #17

    You lost me with most of the rest of your post.
    Find a new slant.

  4. #4
    Joe Asberry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Gordon, Villa, RIP,Stuckey-who needs defense anyway?
    Posts
    1,321
    i really don't know if Stuckey is ready to start, i think CB,RIP and Stuckey is by far the best backcourt rotation in the league, if we gonna trade Chauncey (+ Maxiell) i want a dominant frontcourt player back, like E.Brand...

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts